Cases of Practice | Accountability Mechanisms or Bodies

Last updated 30 August 2026This case study was part of the Assembly for Peace Handbook (2024), but was updated in 2026 to incorporate General Assembly action in the 79th and 80th sessions, in alignment with resolution 79/327's encouragement of annual updates to the Handbook.

Request for an Advisory Opinion on the Obligations of States in Respect of Climate Change (2023)

Requesting an ICJ advisory opinion on States’ legal obligations with regard to climate change represents an effort to address a systemic global challenge with implications for present and future peace and security.

Related practice summary: Accountability

On 29 May 2023, the GA requested from the ICJ an opinion on the obligations of States in respect of climate change (A/RES/77/276). In 2023, spearheaded by the Pacific Island nation of Vanuatu and the support of over 130 countries, resolution 77/276 recognized that climate change “is an unprecedented challenge of civilizational proportions and that the well-being of present and future generations of humankind depends on our immediate and urgent response to it” (ibid.). It requested an opinion on “the obligations of States under international law to ensure the protection of the climate system and other parts of the environment from anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases for States and for present and future generations”, and “the legal consequences under these obligations for States where they, by their acts and omissions, have caused significant harm to the climate system and other parts of the environment” (ibid.).1 The GA recalled a July 2022 resolution on the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment (A/RES/76/300), as well as a December 2022 resolution on the protection of the global climate for present and future generations (A/RES/77/165). Further, the resolution expressed “serious concern that the goal of developed countries to mobilize jointly $100 billion per year by 2020 in the context of meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation has not yet been met” (A/RES/77/276).

During the 79th session, on 23 July 2025, the ICJ issued a unanimous advisory opinion in response to the two questions posed by resolution 77/276.2 The Court found that “States have a duty to prevent significant harm to the environment” and a “duty to co-operate with each other in good faith to prevent significant harm to the climate system and other parts of the environment”.3 This includes the obligation under the Paris Agreement on climate change to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. Breaches of States’ obligations laid out by the advisory opinion were found to constitute an “internationally wrongful act”, the consequences of which may oblige States to cease the wrongful actions or omissions, provide “assurances and guarantees of non-repetition”, and/or provide “full reparation to injured States in the form of restitution, compensation and satisfaction”.4

On 20 May 2026, the GA adopted resolution 80/263 welcoming the ICJ’s advisory opinion and calling upon States to comply with obligations identified by the Court (A/RES/80/263, paras. 1, 2).5 The GA also requested the Secretary-General to submit a report on ways to advance compliance with the Court’s findings during the 82nd session and decided to include follow-up on the advisory opinion as an agenda item of its 83rd session (ibid., paras. 10, 11).

Notes

  1. The second question relates to harm caused “to the climate system and other parts of the environment, with respect to: (i) States, including, in particular, small island developing States, which due to their geographical circumstances and level of development, are injured or specially affected by or are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change … [and] (ii) Peoples and individuals of the present and future generations affected by the adverse effects of climate change”. ↩︎
  2. Obligations of States in Respect of Climate Change, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2025. ↩︎
  3. Ibid., para. 457(B). ↩︎
  4. Ibid., paras. 444-455. ↩︎
  5. A total of 8 countries voted against the resolution, including Belarus, Iran, Israel, Liberia, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, the United States and Yemen. ↩︎

User Guide

For brevity, the Assembly for Peace Handbook (2024) and this website use acronyms for United Nations (UN), General Assembly (GA) and Security Council (SC) wherever they occur. For a full list of all acronyms used and other style guidance visit the About page.