Cases of Practice | Accountability Mechanisms or Bodies

Last updated 30 August 2024This case study was part of the Assembly for Peace Handbook (2024).

Request for an Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (1994)

Following years of resolutions on nuclear disarmament, the General Assembly requested an ICJ advisory opinion on whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons is permitted under international law.

Related practice summary: Accountability

On 15 December 1994, the GA requested an ICJ advisory opinion on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons, noting that “the continuing existence and development of nuclear weapons pose serious risks to humanity”, and that the “complete elimination of nuclear weapons is the only guarantee against the threat of nuclear war” (A/RES/49/75 K). The GA had previously and repeatedly declared the use of nuclear weapons a violation of the UN Charter and a crime against humanity.1

Following on from a similar request by the World Health Organization in May 1993,2 the GA requested the ICJ to render an advisory opinion on the following: “Is the threat or use of nuclear weapons in any circumstance permitted under international law?” (A/RES/49/75 K).3 On 8 July 1996, the Court concluded that “in view of the present state of international law … it cannot reach a definitive conclusion as to the legality or illegality of the use of nuclear weapons by a State in an extreme circumstance of self-defence, in which its very survival would be at stake”.4 The ICJ further agreed, however, on the “obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control”.5

Notes

  1. A/RES/1653 (XVI); A/RES/33/71 B; A/RES/34/83 G; A/RES/35/152 D; A/RES/36/92 I; A/RES/45/59 B; A/RES/46/37 D. ↩︎
  2. One year prior to the GA’s request, the World Health Organization had requested the ICJ to provide an advisory opinion on whether the use of nuclear weapons by a State in war or other armed conflict would constitute a breach of its international law obligations. International Court of Justice, “Request for advisory opinion: legality of the use by a state of nuclear weapons in armed conflict”, 14 May 1993. ↩︎
  3. See also Martin Lailach, “The General Assembly’s request for an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons”, Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 8, No. 2 (1995). ↩︎
  4. A/51/218, p. 266. ↩︎
  5. Ibid., p. 267. ↩︎

User Guide

For brevity, the Assembly for Peace Handbook (2024) and this website use acronyms for United Nations (UN), General Assembly (GA) and Security Council (SC) wherever they occur. For a full list of all acronyms used and other style guidance visit the About page.