Cases of Practice | Responses to Use of Force Situations

Last updated 30 August 2024This case study was part of the Assembly for Peace Handbook (2024).

Cyprus (1974)

General Assembly responses to the 1974 crisis in Cyprus combined calls for the withdrawal of foreign forces with support for negotiations and humanitarian assistance, alongside repeated affirmations of Cyprus’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Related practice summary: Responses to use of force

The island of Cyprus was recognized as an independent republic in August 1960. However, there had long been divisions between the two dominant ethno-linguistic communities on the island (Greek and Turkish) and differing views on whether the island should be independent or be annexed to other countries was the cause of sporadic violence throughout the late 1950s and 1960s. There were multiple attempts to mediate the conflict, involving guarantees by the Governments of Greece, Türkiye and the former colonial authority, the UK. The UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus was created in 1964 to prevent further outbreaks of intercommunal violence (S/RES/186). Throughout this period, GA resolutions frequently encouraged mediation efforts and good offices, and non-interference in Cyprus by external actors on all sides.1

On 15 July 1974, “a coup d’état was carried out against the President of Cyprus”2 by “the National Guard, under the direction of Greek officers”, according to UN sources.3 Five days later, Türkiye launched a “military intervention”, which led to “full-scale hostilities between the National Guard of Cyprus on one side and the Turkish Army and Turkish Cypriot fighters on the other”.4 This resulted in the de facto division of Cyprus between Turkish Cypriots in the north and Greek Cypriots in the south that remains to the present. On 16 August 1974, the SC expressed its grave concern regarding the deteriorating situation, which represented a threat to peace and security in the Mediterranean (S/RES/360). It recorded its “formal disapproval of the unilateral military actions undertaken” and urged parties to comply with prior resolutions, withdraw foreign military personnel and return to peaceful negotiations (ibid.). The GA then echoed many of these points in its resolution on the matter: in resolution 3212 (XXIX) adopted on 1 November 1974, the GA urged the “speedy withdrawal of all foreign armed forces … from the Republic of Cyprus and the cessation of all foreign interference in its affairs”, and called for reinforcing good offices and efforts to find a peaceful solution, as well as efforts to strengthen the peacekeeping force and humanitarian efforts (A/RES/3212(XXIX)). Following the 1974 GA debate, the SC unanimously endorsed the resolution (S/RES/365).

The GA remained seized with the issue in subsequent decades, and in 1977 requested the establishment of an investigatory body with the participation of the Red Cross to speedily resolve the issue of missing persons in Cyprus.5 Later in 1983, the GA expressed support for intercommunal talks and 1977–1979 agreements considered the withdrawal of all occupation forces from the Republic of Cyprus as an essential basis for the solution of the problem, and called for the respect of freedom of settlement and right to property.6

Notes

  1. An example of this is a 1965 resolution calling upon all States to “respect the sovereignty, unity, independence and territorial integrity of the Republic of Cyprus and to refrain from any intervention directed against it” (A/RES/2077(XX)). It was adopted with 47 votes to 5, with 54 abstentions. ↩︎
  2. United Nations, “Chapter XII: The Situation in Cyprus”, Yearbook of the United Nations, 1974, vol. 28 (United Nations Publication, 1974), pp. 256–296. ↩︎
  3. UNFICYP, “Events in the Summer of 1974”, 22 November 2025. The GA and SC resolutions passed during this time are silent as to the origin of support for the coup d’état, as are other official UN sources such as the UN Yearbook and UN repertoire for this period. Some of these sources, as well as the meeting records of deliberations within the GA and the SC during this time, document some of the competing attributions or denials from both sides, as well as allegations of other attacks and sources of violence against certain parts of the population, contributing to the conflict. United Nations, Chapter VIII, “The Situation in Cyprus” in Repertoire of the Practice of the Security Council, Supplement 1972–1974 (United Nations publication, 1979), pp. 149–160; United Nations, “Chapter XII: The Situation in Cyprus”, Yearbook of the United Nations, 1974, vol. 28 (United Nations Publication, 1974), pp. 256–296; S/PV.1779; S/PV.1780; S/PV.1781; A/PV.2271; A/PV.2275. Additional UN sources were added to this footnote as part of the 2026 updating process, and a fuller excerpt of the language in these sources included in the text. ↩︎
  4. United Nations, “Chapter XII: The Situation in Cyprus”, Yearbook of the United Nations, 1974, vol. 28 (United Nations Publication, 1974), pp. 256-257. ↩︎
  5. A/RES/32/128 (1977). ↩︎
  6. A/RES/37/253 (1983). ↩︎

User Guide

For brevity, the Assembly for Peace Handbook (2024) and this website use acronyms for United Nations (UN), General Assembly (GA) and Security Council (SC) wherever they occur. For a full list of all acronyms used and other style guidance visit the About page.